Quote
134.63
-0.87 (-0.64%)
We have scored 98 news catalysts on PEP (PEP) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.18). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and factor value.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
134.51–136.05
Open
135.41
Prev close
135.50
Volume
4.1M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged PEP or its network in the window yet.
Show more PEP articles →Analysts publish price targets on PEP, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
18 analyst price targets from $134 to $183
as of 2026-08-26
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about PEP — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of PEP, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for PEP: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The reconstruction
The price sits at the 28th percentile of published models, meaning it broadly agrees with the middle of the analyst range but explicitly rejects the four bull cases that require a massive acceleration in growth the company has not yet delivered.
What the disagreement turns on
Does the second half of 2026 mark a true, margin-accretive volume inflection in North America, or is the recent revenue improvement a fragile mix of one-off international gains and unsustainable pricing? This is directly testable via quarterly unit volume growth rates.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
Computed at $142 on 2026-08-26 — the quote has since moved -5%, so read this as a record of what was priced in then, not now.
