NASDAQ
62.44USD
-0.03 (-0.05%)
We have scored 46 news catalysts on Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) over the past 12 months. The biggest single-day move next to one of them came Jun 11, 2026, when MDLZ closed −1.3%: “3 Safe Haven Stocks For Market Chaos”. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.35). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and institutional appeal.
Dots are scored news catalysts — size = impact, color = sentiment. Tap one to read it.
Market cap
79.6B
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
0.40
52W range
51.2-66.65
Day range
62.21–62.90
Open
62.87
Prev close
62.47
Volume
5.6M
Avg volume
8.5M
Dividend
2.00
IPO
2001-06-13
Analysts publish price targets on MDLZ, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
5 analyst price targets from $68 to $73
as of 2026-09-04
The market is 15% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about Mondelez International, Inc. — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of Mondelez International, Inc., taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for MDLZ: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
Mondelez International, Inc. operates as a prominent global entity in the snack and beverage sector, focusing on the production, promotion, and distribution of a wide array of food items. Its extensive reach spans multiple continents, including North America, Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. The company's diverse product portfolio encompasses biscuits (such as cookies, crackers, and various savory snacks), chocolates, chewing gums, candies, as well as selection of cheese and general grocery products, and powdered beverage mixes. Among its well-recognized brands are Cadbury, Milka, and Toblerone chocolates; Oreo, belVita, and LU biscuits; Halls candies; Trident chewing gum; and Tang powdered beverages. Mondelez distributes its offerings through a comprehensive network of retail outlets, catering to a broad spectrum of clients including large supermarket chains, wholesalers, supercenters, club stores, mass merchandisers, convenience stores, petrol stations, pharmacies, discount stores, and other food retailers. This complex distribution system leverages direct store delivery, proprietary and external warehousing solutions, third-party distributors, independent sales agents, and digital e-commerce platforms. Established in 2000, the company was initially known as Kraft Foods Inc. before officially changing its name to Mondelez International, Inc. in October 2012. Its corporate headquarters are situated in Chicago, Illinois.
At $62.44, the stock sits 15% below the median analyst target of $72 and at the very bottom of the published model range ($68–$73), meaning the market flatly rejects the bullish consensus and demands a significant discount to what the banks think it is worth.
What the disagreement turns on
The price assumes Mondelez will not accelerate its revenue beyond the company's own 3–5% long-term targets, so the central question is whether the recent 12.9% growth in chocolate can be sustained and pull the overall growth rate higher; unit volume data is wired and can test this, but street-level pricing data is not.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
