Quote
257.49
+4.96 (+1.96%)
We have scored 98 news catalysts on MCD (MCD) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.21). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and price momentum.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
254.28–258.45
Open
254.28
Prev close
252.53
Volume
4.1M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged MCD or its network in the window yet.
Show more MCD articles →Analysts publish price targets on MCD, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
19 analyst price targets from $285 to $350
as of 2026-08-27
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about MCD — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of MCD, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for MCD: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The reconstruction
The price sits at the very bottom of the published analyst target range ($285 to $350), meaning the market leans heavily bearish and refuses to pay for the growth acceleration those models require.
What the disagreement turns on
Can the US segment regain traffic growth and pricing power through its value menu and beverage platform, or is the current +1.8% growth a structural ceiling that makes the required +12.6% overall revenue growth mathematically impossible? Segment revenue history can measure same-store sales and unit volumes to settle this.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
