Fox Business
11 Feb 2026, 19:16 UTC · 37w ago
Impact · against what's priced in
Ford faces a severe valuation reset following a massive $11.1 billion quarterly loss and a $19.5 billion write-down on EV assets. The pivot toward hybrids and the delayed break-even target of 2029 for the EV unit signal a fundamental failure in prior capital allocation.
No priced-in read yet
What the story claims
5 claims · scored −1 bearish … +1 bullish
Ford reported its largest quarterly loss since 2008, posting a fourth-quarter net loss of $11.1 billion.
More negative than 99% of claims this week
Ford took a $19.5 billion charge on its EV assets as it pivots strategy toward hybrids and affordable EVs due to low consumer demand.
So whatLarge writedowns signal a failure in previous capital allocation and a strategic retreat from the primary growth engine of the industry.
Continue reading
5 related stories
Ford reported its largest quarterly loss since 2008, driven by a $19.5 billion EV asset charge and an additional $900 million hit from tariff-relief retroactivity.
Read from the article alone
No priced-in read yet
A strong outlook for Microsoft is reviving the broader AI trade for semiconductor stocks.
Read from the article alone
No priced-in read yet
Lockheed Martin's CEO indicates the Trump administration is fundamentally changing the game for defense acquisitions.
Read from the article alone
Scored by the NIS engine · methodology.
Top 3 movers · tap to explore
More negative than 95% of claims this week
Ford's EV division lost $4.8 billion last year and is projected to lose between $4 billion and $4.5 billion in 2026, with break-even not targeted until 2029.
More negative than 91% of claims this week
Ford suffered an additional $900 million loss due to a change in the Trump administration's tariff-relief program retroactivity.
So whatThis highlights vulnerability to policy shifts and adds immediate downward pressure on margins.
More negative than 79% of claims this week
Ford's fourth quarter revenue of $45.9 billion exceeded analysts' expectations.
More positive than 48% of claims this week
Which stocks this story touches
More negative than 97% of ticker scores this week
Reported largest quarterly loss since 2008 due to EV failures, tariffs, and a $19.5B charge.
More positive than 87% of ticker scores this week
Strong outlook is reviving the AI trade for semiconductor stocks.
More positive than 68% of ticker scores this week
CEO states Trump administration is 'changing the entire game' on defense acquisition.
More negative than 78% of ticker scores this week
Mixed reports with one analyst stating the company is in a 'world of trouble'.
More positive than 59% of ticker scores this week
CEO claims an 'unmatched value proposition' regarding X Money launch.
More negative than 70% of ticker scores this week
Stock declines despite record revenue, although one analyst views it as an AI winner.
More positive than 53% of ticker scores this week
CTO discusses the US-China AI race and the push to realize economic value from AI models.
More positive than 45% of ticker scores this week
Company is doubling down on AI spending, indicating growth investment.
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The Motley Fool
2h ago
More positive than 34% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] Both companies are discussed as part of the 'Big Tech' group competing in the AI space.
More positive than 34% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] Both companies are discussed as primary players in the AI market race.
More positive than 34% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] Both companies are analyzed together in the context of their AI-driven earnings reports.
+1.2%
Price agrees with the score
$636.95 vs $629.56 close before publication (Feb 10) · not market-adjusted
LMT chart →+26.3%
Price agrees with the score
$521.91 vs $413.27 close before publication (Feb 10) · not market-adjusted
MSFT chart →−9.9%
Price agrees with the score
$12.22 vs $13.57 close before publication (Feb 10) · not market-adjusted
F chart →
