Quote
830.17
-32.16 (-3.73%)
We have scored 95 news catalysts on STX (STX) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.42). Most of the impact sits in sector technology and forward growth expectations.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
817.68–870.68
Open
869.42
Prev close
862.33
Volume
3.8M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged STX or its network in the window yet.
Show more STX articles →Analysts publish price targets on STX, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
17 analyst price targets from $775 to $1,600
as of 2026-09-11
The market is 17% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about STX — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of STX, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for STX: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The reconstruction
The price sits at the 12th percentile of 17 published models, 17% below the median target of $1,035, meaning the market believes the recent 34% revenue surge will decelerate sharply and refuses to pay for the sustained AI-storage boom that 11 bull models assume.
What the disagreement turns on
Does the AI-driven storage demand and the duopoly's pricing power extend beyond the current near-term allocation, justifying sustained high growth and margins, or does the market correctly assume a sharp deceleration back toward cyclical norms? Unit volume data can measure whether revenue growth is actually tracking toward the 20.9% deceleration the price assumes or the sustained high-growth path the bull models require.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
