Quote
—
—
We have scored 70 news catalysts on SLB (SLB) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.34). Most of the impact sits in sector energy and revenue cyclicality.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged SLB or its network in the window yet.
Show more SLB articles →Analysts publish price targets on SLB, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
14 analyst price targets from $54 to $71
as of 2026-08-27
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about SLB — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of SLB, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for SLB: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The reconstruction
The price sits at the very bottom of the published model range ($54 to $71), matching the two lowest targets and fully rejecting the eleven bull cases that see 16% to 32% upside, meaning the market leans strongly bearish against the analyst consensus and demands proof that growth is actually accelerating.
What the disagreement turns on
Can SLB's data center revenue scale fast enough to offset the massive absolute dollar declines in Well Construction and Digital Integration, and will offshore project approvals actually translate into higher rig counts? The available data can measure segment revenue history and quarterly data center run rates, but it cannot directly measure the pace of deepwater project approvals.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
