Quote
—
—
We have scored 25 news catalysts on SJM (SJM) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.21). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and institutional appeal.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged SJM or its network in the window yet.
Show more SJM articles →Analysts publish price targets on SJM, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
25 analyst price targets from $95 to $157
as of 2026-09-05
The market is within 3% of the median target — broadly agreeing with the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about SJM — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of SJM, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for SJM: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price sits at the 44th percentile of 25 published models, essentially endorsing the median target and fully reflecting the consensus that SJM can grow revenue at roughly 4% annually while absorbing near-term price cuts.
What the disagreement turns on
Can the company replace the revenue it is deliberately cutting with new volume growth, or will the price cuts simply shrink the business? Consumer attention and unit volume data are wired and can test this, but the actual retail pricing needed to confirm the margin story is not.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
