Quote
20.38
+0.31 (+1.54%)
We have scored 70 news catalysts on PRCT (PRCT) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans negative (average ticker sentiment −0.67). Most of the impact sits in price momentum and institutional appeal.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
19.55–20.67
Open
20.53
Prev close
20.07
Volume
1.6M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged PRCT or its network in the window yet.
Show more PRCT articles →Analysts publish price targets on PRCT, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
10 analyst price targets from $19 to $30
as of 2026-09-01
The market is within 4% of the median target — broadly agreeing with the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about PRCT — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of PRCT, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for PRCT: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price sits at the 50th percentile of published models, broadly endorsing the middle of the analyst set and explicitly rejecting the 18-42% upside offered by four bull cases.
What the disagreement turns on
Does the 30% sequential drop in U.S. handpiece sales represent a permanent pull-forward of demand that leaves the business impaired, or a temporary inventory glut that clears to allow a return to organic growth? Unit volume data can measure the trajectory, but it cannot definitively separate true procedure demand from channel stuffing.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
