Quote
13.02
-0.45 (-3.34%)
We have scored 94 news catalysts on PL (PL) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.30). Most of the impact sits in price momentum and short squeeze potential.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
13.02–13.69
Open
13.62
Prev close
13.47
Volume
4.2M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged PL or its network in the window yet.
Show more PL articles →Analysts publish price targets on PL, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
8 analyst price targets from $22 to $53
as of 2026-09-04
The market is 57% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about PL — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of PL, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for PL: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price at $13.02 sits at the absolute bottom of the published analyst targets ($22 to $53), rejecting all premium valuations and leaning heavily bearish against the median $42 forecast.
What the disagreement turns on
Can Planet Labs sustain the roughly 28% annual revenue growth required by the reverse-DCF, and can the available data on segment revenue history actually confirm that trajectory?
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
Computed at $18.35 on 2026-09-04 — the quote has since moved -29%, so read this as a record of what was priced in then, not now.
