Quote
—
—
We have scored 34 news catalysts on MKC (MKC) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.26). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and institutional appeal.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged MKC or its network in the window yet.
Show more MKC articles →Analysts publish price targets on MKC, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
5 analyst price targets from $51 to $68
as of 2026-09-05
The market is within 5% of the median target — broadly agreeing with the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about MKC — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of MKC, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for MKC: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price sits at the 40th percentile of the published model spread ($51-$68), meaning it broadly agrees with the endorsed median targets but entirely rejects the 15-31% upside that the two bull cases rest on.
What the disagreement turns on
The price assumes the Unilever merger creates more balance-sheet risk than strategic reward; whether the combined company can actually deliver the $600 million in synergies and 21% operating margins is the question, and the available data cannot measure it because pricing, store counts, and hiring are not wired.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
