Quote
—
—
We have scored 34 news catalysts on LW (LW) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans mixed (average ticker sentiment +0.07). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and price momentum.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged LW or its network in the window yet.
Show more LW articles →Analysts publish price targets on LW, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
9 analyst price targets from $48 to $57
as of 2026-09-24
The market is 17% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about LW — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Latest scored catalyst for LW: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
At $45.04, the stock sits at the very bottom of the published model range ($48–$57), rejecting the near-consensus bull case and leaning heavily bearish against the analysts' median target of $54.
What the disagreement turns on
The central question is whether Lamb Weston can expand its margins toward the 25% adjusted EBITDA target that activists and bulls are projecting; unit volume trends are measurable, but the pricing power needed to reach that margin cannot be tested with the wired data.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
