Quote
99.09
+0.94 (+0.96%)
We have scored 60 news catalysts on KMB (KMB) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.17). Most of the impact sits in sector consumer and factor value.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
99.00–100.92
Open
99.18
Prev close
98.15
Volume
6.1M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged KMB or its network in the window yet.
Show more KMB articles →Analysts publish price targets on KMB, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
5 analyst price targets from $115 to $121
as of 2026-09-13
The market is 15% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about KMB — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of KMB, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for KMB: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price sits 15% below the lowest published target and at the 0% percentile of the model spread, meaning the market has explicitly rejected the bullish consensus and is pricing in material deterioration rather than the recovery the models assume.
What the disagreement turns on
Whether the Huggies China volume collapse is a temporary shock or a permanent loss of market share, and whether the available unit volume data can detect a recovery before the market re-prices the stock.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
