Quote
—
—
We have scored 24 news catalysts on HWC (HWC) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.58). Most of the impact sits in sector financials and institutional appeal.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged HWC or its network in the window yet.
Show more HWC articles →Analysts publish price targets on HWC, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
8 analyst price targets from $74 to $87
as of 2026-09-14
The market is 9% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about HWC — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Latest scored catalyst for HWC: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The reconstruction
The price sits at the 12th percentile of published models, leaning bearish against the analyst set and refusing to pay for the upside that two bull targets at $87 represent.
What the disagreement turns on
Whether commercial real estate charge-offs remain contained and allow the bank to resume buybacks, a question that unit volume data alone cannot settle because credit quality and capital return decisions are not wired as observables.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
