Quote
—
—
We have scored 84 news catalysts on CVLT (CVLT) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans negative (average ticker sentiment −0.53). Most of the impact sits in price momentum and earnings revision trend.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged CVLT or its network in the window yet.
Show more CVLT articles →Analysts publish price targets on CVLT, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
11 analyst price targets from $130 to $182
as of 2026-09-04
The market is 9% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about CVLT — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Latest scored catalyst for CVLT: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The reconstruction
The price sits 9% below the median published target and at the 45th percentile by count, meaning the market has absorbed the recent net new ARR miss and associated lawsuits, and explicitly refuses to pay for the growth recovery the four bull models assume.
What the disagreement turns on
Does the company deliver a step-up in net new subscription ARR in the second half of the fiscal year as management forecast, or does the Q3 miss mark the start of a sustained deceleration? The wired data can measure subscription unit volumes to settle this, but cannot measure competitive pricing pressure or the legal outcomes.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
