Quote
109.23
-0.07 (-0.06%)
We have scored 104 news catalysts on BABA (BABA) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans mixed (average ticker sentiment −0.06). Most of the impact sits in sector technology and forward growth expectations.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
107.84–110.43
Open
108.28
Prev close
109.30
Volume
6.3M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged BABA or its network in the window yet.
Show more BABA articles →Analysts publish price targets on BABA, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
6 analyst price targets from $160 to $200
as of 2026-09-11
The market is 37% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about BABA — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of BABA, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for BABA: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price sits 37% below the median analyst target of $172, at the very bottom of the published range, meaning the market entirely rejects the bullish consensus and prices in severe structural and geopolitical risk.
What the disagreement turns on
Whether Alibaba Cloud's massive AI-driven revenue growth can eventually convert into positive free cash flow despite current capital burn, and whether the geopolitical risk of the U.S. military designation will be resolved — neither of which can be settled by the wired data (unit volumes alone cannot prove margin conversion, and geopolitical risk has no measurable proxy here).
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
