Quote
177.85
+4.87 (+2.82%)
We have scored 52 news catalysts on AMT (AMT) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.39). Most of the impact sits in sector realestate and institutional appeal.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
174.34–178.54
Open
174.59
Prev close
172.98
Volume
1.9M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged AMT or its network in the window yet.
Show more AMT articles →Analysts publish price targets on AMT, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
8 analyst price targets from $188 to $215
as of 2026-09-02
The market is 15% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about AMT — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Latest scored catalyst for AMT: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price sits at the very bottom of the published model range ($188 to $215), rejecting the six bull cases and leaning bearish against the median target by roughly 15%.
What the disagreement turns on
Can the data center segment and broader property revenue accelerate fast enough to hit a 12.3% compound growth rate, and the available unit volume data can measure the revenue trajectory but cannot measure the tenant pricing or capacity utilization that would confirm the margin expansion required.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
