Quote
117.52
-4.18 (-3.43%)
We have scored 75 news catalysts on ALB (ALB) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.49). Most of the impact sits in revenue cyclicality and price momentum.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
117.24–121.75
Open
121.75
Prev close
121.70
Volume
2.4M
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged ALB or its network in the window yet.
Show more ALB articles →Analysts publish price targets on ALB, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
8 analyst price targets from $161 to $257
as of 2026-09-11
The market is 40% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about ALB — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of ALB, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for ALB: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price at $118 sits 40% below the median analyst target of $202 and at the absolute floor of the published spread, meaning the market completely rejects the bullish consensus and prices in a prolonged lithium downturn rather than the recovery the models assume.
What the disagreement turns on
Does the Energy Storage segment's volume growth actually accelerate fast enough to offset flat EV demand and potential Chinese supply returning, and the wired data can only measure the revenue outcome, not the pricing power behind it.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
