Quote
—
—
We have scored 76 news catalysts on AFRM (AFRM) over the past 12 months. Coverage across the window leans positive (average ticker sentiment +0.36). Most of the impact sits in price momentum and sector financials.
Market cap
—
P/E
—
EPS
—
Beta
—
52W range
—
Day range
—
Open
—
Prev close
—
Volume
—
Avg volume
—
Dividend
—
IPO
—
No scored news tagged AFRM or its network in the window yet.
Show more AFRM articles →Analysts publish price targets on AFRM, and they disagree. Where the share price actually sits among them shows which of their arguments the market is buying — and which it is ignoring.
23 analyst price targets from $82 to $115
as of 2026-09-10
The market is 32% below the median target — more cautious than the analysts.
The reconstruction
Daily OHLCV with SMA overlays and session pivots. Draw your levels and trendlines on it, or ask the AI analyst what the price is reacting to.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors, derived from what the news actually says about AFRM — not a sector bucket. Click an edge to see the articles that established the link.
Suppliers, customers, partners and competitors of AFRM, taken from what the news actually said about them rather than from a sector bucket. The count is how many articles established each link.
Latest scored catalyst for AFRM: .
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The price at $68.15 sits at the absolute bottom of 23 published models (ranging from $82 to $115), meaning the market has fully absorbed the recent results but entirely rejects the bullish growth and margin assumptions those targets require.
What the disagreement turns on
Can the Affirm Card sustain its 130% volume growth and pull the overall revenue growth rate back above 20%, and the wired data can only confirm the top-line volume, not the profitability or credit quality that the bear case doubts.
The price pays for
It declines to pay for
Written by a language model from the published models, the reported segments and a reverse-DCF — not a recommendation, and not a house view.
Claim by claim
