fundamental-sentimentAt 07:00 AM, Monday through Friday (Europe/Copenhagen)

Burry Deep Value.

Michael Burry's documented method, run on both sides of the book. Half of it is a conventional value screen — EV/EBITDA (industry-relative, as Burry describes it), free cash flow, low debt, enterprise value rather than market cap. The other half is the part a conventional screener cannot run at all: Burry looked for "ick" stocks that provoke revulsion, and for the neglected — "unpopular companies that look like road kill". Those are facts about ATTENTION and SENTIMENT, and this platform measures both per ticker per day.

Over a 90-day window across ~3,885 covered tickers, sentiment runs p10 -0.28 / median +0.41 / p90 +0.80. It skews strongly positive, so a negative reading is genuinely rare — which is what makes "ick" a discriminating gate rather than a mood.

Pipeline (cheap gates first; the fundamental step costs one API call per survivor):

Attention gates, one query. LONG — 90-day average sentiment below zero AND mention count inside a neglect band (enough coverage to be real, little enough to be ignored). SHORT — sentiment above +0.60 AND heavily covered.
Liquidity floor: enough price and volume to take and exit a position.
Value gates, per survivor: LONG — EV/EBITDA under a SECTOR-relative ceiling (tech 18x … energy 8x), free cash flow yield above 4%, net debt / EBITDA under 3.5x. SHORT — EV/EBITDA above 1.5x the sector ceiling AND free cash flow yield under 2%: rich on the multiple and not generating the cash to justify it. A rich multiple on strong cash flow is a good business, not a short.
Rare-bird flag (not a gate): working capital per share above the price — Burry's "selling at less than two-thirds of net value". Flagged when found, because those deserve longer holding periods.
Margin of safety, where available: the priced-in programme's reverse-DCF. median_gap says where the price sits against published analyst models; implied_revenue_cagr says what growth the price REQUIRES. Only ~476 names carry one, so it annotates rather than gates — requiring it would cap the board at the large-cap end and exclude exactly the neglected names the screen exists to find.

NO market-regime gate, unlike NIS Short. Gating on the S&P's 200-day is O'Neil's timing discipline; Burry is early on purpose and holds through the drawdown.

This is deliberately NOT the NIS Short method. That board shorts former leaders in a Stage-4 breakdown, entered 5-15 weeks after the top. This one shorts what is expensive, adored and crowded while it is still going up.

Known gap: short interest / days-to-cover is not available, so squeeze risk on the short side is unscreened — the same hole NIS Short documents. Rows carry a side field so one run answers both questions.

AI analysis prompt

After this screening produces tickers, an LLM runs this prompt against each ticker’s 6-month price action and attaches notes and entry levels to the result.

You are a deep-value analyst working in Michael Burry's documented style. You receive ONE ticker at a time. It has already passed a screen with two halves: it is cheap on enterprise value and free cash flow, AND the market is either ignoring it or actively dislikes it (for a LONG), or it is expensive and adored (for a SHORT). Check the `side` field before you reason. What Burry actually cares about, in order: 1. ENTERPRISE VALUE, not market cap. Debt is part of the price. Check net debt / EBITDA is survivable, not merely low. 2. FREE CASH FLOW, because it is harder to manipulate than earnings. Is it positive, and is it growing? A single good year is not a record. 3. MARGIN OF SAFETY. What has to go RIGHT for this price to be justified? If the answer is "nothing — it is already priced for decline", that is the trade. Where `implied_revenue_cagr` is present it is the growth the current price REQUIRES; compare it to what the company has actually delivered. 4. WHY IS IT HATED? Read the coverage. There is a difference between a business in permanent decline and a good business inside a bad story. Burry wants the second. Name the specific reason the market is repelled, and say whether it is a fact about the business or a fact about the narrative. 5. WHAT KILLS IT. A cheap company with a broken balance sheet is not cheap; it is a call option. Say what would make you wrong. For a SHORT: the thesis is that the price requires something that will not happen, NOT that the chart is broken. "Expensive" alone is not a thesis — expensive things stay expensive for years. Name the specific assumption the price is paying for in full and say why it fails. Flag squeeze risk if the float is small or the name is a retail favourite; short interest is not screened upstream. Be explicit that being early is expected. This method looks wrong for months by design. Do not recommend waiting for confirmation — that is a different strategy, and the platform already has a board for it. Give a verdict, a position size relative to conviction (shorts smaller than longs at equal conviction — a short's loss is unbounded), and the single measurable thing that would settle the thesis either way.

Tickers: 44results
Last run: 52m ago
Trigger rate: 100%3/3 runs
Cadence: At 07:00 AM, Monday through Friday (Europe/Copenhagen)

Latest results

Sep 05, 2026, 2:03 PM

CSV JSON

Symbol	Sector	Industry	Analyst Target Median	Earnings Yield	Enterprise Value	Ev To Ebitda	Ev To Fcf	Fcf Yield	Implied Revenue Cagr	AI Analysis	Market Cap	Median Gap	Mentions 90d	N Targets	Net Debt To Ebitda	Price	Scored 90d	Sector Ev Ebitda Ceiling	Sentiment 90d	Side	Volume	Working Capital
AMPH	Healthcare	Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic	—	0.08	1,737,602,540	8.18	14.33	0.10	—	pipelineLong @ 23.18· TP 32· SL 19.50 Deep-value play; market dislikes the narrative while fundamentals remain robust.	1,022,073,862	—	4	—	2.29	23.18	1	14	-1	long	626,116	477,860,000
LKQ	Consumer Cyclical	Auto - Parts	30	0.08	12,470,180,000	8.57	14.72	0.11	0.00	pipelineLong @ 25.54· TP 30· SL 21.17 Deep-value play on an ignored cash-cow with an extremely low implied growth requirement.	6,461,673,557	-0.16	17	6	3.26	25.54	17	12	-0.86	long	2,296,554	2,111,000,000
MTN	Consumer Cyclical	Gambling, Resorts & Casinos	—	0.05	8,586,862,300	9.86	26.86	0.06	—	pipelineLong @ 134.96· TP 160· SL 118 Deep-value play: Market pricing in structural decline while EV/EBITDA remains disciplined.	4,809,100,669	—	7	—	3.45	134.96	6	12	-0.60	long	443,072	-617,836,000
EBS	Healthcare	Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic	—	0.08	1,027,960,000	4.28	6.56	0.24	—	pipelineLong @ 6.21· TP 9.03· SL 4.36 Deep value play: EV/FCF of 6.5x with survivable debt and heavy market pessimism.	320,413,023	—	3	—	1.53	6.21	2	14	-0.60	long	998,356	530,300,001
BBW	Consumer Cyclical	Specialty Retail	—	0.07	879092113.92	11.05	22.25	0.05	—	pipelineLong @ 29.43· TP 43.26· SL 26.50 Deep-value long: Net debt is manageable; market discounting a retail narrative crash.	368,975,682	—	5	—	1.26	29.43	5	12	-0.55	long	556,853	49,394,000
NE	Energy	Oil & Gas Drilling	—	0.05	5,990,937,280	5.87	13.86	0.10	—	pipelineLong @ 45.61· TP 54.98· SL 41.84 Deep-value play: Low EV/EBITDA and manageable debt amidst negative market sentiment.	7,281,271,620	—	11	—	1.47	45.61	9	8	-0.51	long	1,128,980	512,553,000
RLI	Financial Services	Insurance - Property & Casualty	—	0.07	5,948,862,540	11.21	9.77	0.10	—	pipelineLong @ 62.40· TP 72· SL 59 Deep value in P&C insurance; priced for stagnation despite strong FCF and clean balance sheet.	5,726,635,200	—	5	—	0.09	62.40	1	12	-0.50	long	456,938	-1,391,586,000
THO	Consumer Cyclical	Auto - Recreational Vehicles	—	0.05	5166639651.23	8.39	11.36	0.09	—	pipelineLong @ 76.94· TP 88.57· SL 69.71 Deep value play in hated RV sector; fortress balance sheet with low EV/EBITDA.	4,005,294,279	—	5	—	0.55	76.94	3	12	-0.50	long	495,518	1,193,279,000
KD	Technology	Information Technology Services	—	0.07	5,328,296,000	1.63	15.67	0.11	—	pipelineLong @ 13.15· TP 16.16· SL 12 Deep-value setup: Extreme EV/EBITDA discrepancy vs sentiment.	2,899,801,285	—	11	—	0.71	13.15	12	18	-0.50	long	3,429,161	-779,000,000
ADTN	Technology	Communication Equipment	—	-0.07	842,299,980	10.45	8.59	0.14	—	pipelineLong @ 7.10· TP 11.41· SL 6.50 Deep-value play: FCF yield is strong, Net Debt/EBITDA is survivable, and sentiment is deeply negative.	575,086,510	—	10	—	1.85	7.10	10	18	-0.48	long	1,644,113	273,364,000

Showing 10 of 44

Recent runs

Sep 05, 2026, 2:03 PMTriggered
Burry deep value — 42 long, 2 short (from 222 attention candidates, 3885 covered). CHEAP, HATED, UNWATCHED: AMPH · sent -1.00 · 4 mentions · EV/EBITDA 8.2 · FCF yield 9.7% LKQ · sent -0.86 · 17 mentions · EV/EBITDA 8.6 · FCF yield 11.0% · -16% vs analyst median MTN · sent -0.60 · 7 mentions · EV/EBITDA 9.9 · FCF yield 5.7% EBS · sent -0.60 · 3 mentions · EV/EBITDA 4.3 · FCF yield 23.7% · RARE BIRD BBW · sent -0.55 · 5 mentions · EV/EBITDA 11.0 · FCF yield 5.1% NE · sent -0.51 · 11 mentions · EV/EBITDA 5.9 · FCF yield 9.6% RLI · sent -0.50 · 5 mentions · EV/EBITDA 11.2 · FCF yield 10.3% THO · sent -0.50 · 5 mentions · EV/EBITDA 8.4 · FCF yield 9.4% KD · sent -0.50 · 11 mentions · EV/EBITDA 1.6 · FCF yield 11.4% ADTN · sent -0.48 · 10 mentions · EV/EBITDA 10.4 · FCF yield 14.1% PPC · sent -0.42 · 8 mentions · EV/EBITDA 5.7 · FCF yield 7.0% SFD · sent -0.40 · 4 mentions · EV/EBITDA 5.9 · FCF yield 8.1% SSTK · sent -0.38 · 12 mentions · EV/EBITDA 4.4 · FCF yield 18.4% GAP · sent -0.34 · 12 mentions · EV/EBITDA 8.1 · FCF yield 7.9% · -2% vs analyst median GEHC · sent -0.34 · 13 mentions · EV/EBITDA 11.3 · FCF yield 4.0% · -8% vs analyst median EXEL · sent -0.30 · 13 mentions · EV/EBITDA 12.5 · FCF yield 7.1% · +13% vs analyst median BANC · sent -0.28 · 5 mentions · EV/EBITDA 9.3 · FCF yield 7.8% BAH · sent -0.27 · 7 mentions · EV/EBITDA 10.5 · FCF yield 9.9% KBH · sent -0.27 · 12 mentions · EV/EBITDA 9.9 · FCF yield 6.6% · RARE BIRD TDOC · sent -0.26 · 10 mentions · EV/EBITDA 10.1 · FCF yield 23.1% RICH, ADORED, CROWDED: CEG · sent +0.65 · 34 mentions · EV/EBITDA 23.1 · FCF yield 1.2% · -21% vs analyst median HWM · sent +0.74 · 142 mentions · EV/EBITDA 37.4 · FCF yield 1.7% · -22% vs analyst median