Zacks Investment Research
03 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC · 11w ago
Impact · against what's priced in
The article provides baseline expectations for Energy Transfer's Q2 earnings but offers no catalyst for a price move, as the Zacks model does not conclusively predict a beat. Other energy sector names mentioned lack specific financial data in the text, rendering the mentions non-material.
No priced-in read yet
What the story claims
3 claims · scored −1 bearish … +1 bullish
Energy Transfer (ET) is projected to report a 61.57% year-over-year increase in second-quarter 2026 revenues, totaling $31.09 billion.
More positive than 81% of claims this week
Energy Transfer (ET) is expected to report second-quarter earnings of 39 cents per unit on August 4.
So whatEarnings estimates provide the baseline for market reaction; a move toward this target is fundamentally neutral to slightly positive.
Continue reading
5 related stories
The company is listed as being in the same sector with a Zacks Rank #2, but no specific financial catalysts are provided.
Read from the article alone
No priced-in read yet
The company is mentioned as a sector peer with a Zacks Rank #2, but the article contains no specific fundamental data.
Read from the article alone
No priced-in read yet
The company is mentioned as a sector peer with a Zacks Rank #1, but the article provides no specific financial guidance or figures.
Read from the article alone
Scored by the NIS engine · methodology.
Top 1 mover · tap to explore
More positive than 56% of claims this week
Fee-based contracts and strong NGL export volumes are expected to provide stable and supportive revenue streams for Energy Transfer's Q2 results.
More positive than 56% of claims this week
Which stocks this story touches
More positive than 84% of ticker scores this week
Highlighted as having a combination of factors indicating a likely earnings beat and a Zacks Rank #1.
More positive than 79% of ticker scores this week
Highlighted as having a combination of factors indicating a likely earnings beat and a Zacks Rank #2.
More positive than 79% of ticker scores this week
Highlighted as having a combination of factors indicating a likely earnings beat and a Zacks Rank #2.
More positive than 68% of ticker scores this week
Expected year-over-year improvement in revenues and earnings with stable fee-based revenue streams.
Free · No account
Get a free daily PDF briefing — the last 24 hours of news, with summaries and the market-impact score for each story, delivered an hour before the open.
We’ll watch
Pre-filled from this story — remove any you don’t want. Add more tickers & tags or fine-tune your watchlist anytime — every email has an edit link, no account needed.
Free forever · one email a day, max · unsubscribe in one click.How it works
The Motley Fool
2h ago
More positive than 6% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] The article identifies these companies as being in the same sector.
More positive than 6% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] The article identifies these companies as being in the same sector.
More positive than 6% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] The article identifies these companies as being in the same sector.
More positive than 6% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] The article identifies these companies as being in the same sector.
More positive than 6% of relationship scores this week
[mutual] The article identifies these companies as being in the same sector.
−4.3%
$44.58 vs $46.57 close before publication (Jul 31) · not market-adjusted
WES chart →+19.0%
$52.59 vs $44.19 close before publication (Jul 31) · not market-adjusted
CLMT chart →−19.5%
$21.69 vs $26.96 close before publication (Jul 31) · not market-adjusted
NESR chart →
